174 F.2d 480
Docket No. 12614.
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Decided May 9, 1949.
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-05-09
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1959
2 federal appellate ·
2 counsel of record
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Martin v. Hiatt
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-05-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1No appearance entered for appellant.
¶2J. Ellis Mundy, U. S. Attorney, Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U. S. Attorney, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
¶3Before HOLMES, McCORD, and WALLER, Circuit Judges.
¶5The judgment of the lower Court must be affirmed because of the failure of the petitioner to comply with Sec. 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A.2 Moreover, we find no reversible error in the case otherwise.
¶6Judgment is affirmed.