Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 F.2d 754 - Epstein v. United States

Epstein v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

174 F.2d 754 · 1949

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

70 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Bender v. Southland Corp. (1984), United States v. Frost (1997)

70 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

20019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Pepper v. Litton · Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. · McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. · Washburn v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Actual fraud has been defined as intentional fraud, consisting in deception intentionally practiced to induce another to part with property or to surrender some legal right, and which accomplishes the end designed. It requires intent to deceive. (Citations omitted). . . . Constructive fraud is a breach of legal or equitable duty which in spite of the fact that there is no moral guilt resulting from the breach of duty, the law declares fraudulent because of its tendency to deceive others, to violate public or private confidence or to injure public interests.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he receipt of such returns by a director without disclosure of interest to the board of directors does not constitute the perpetration of an active, intentional fraud upon his corporation where there is good faith, fair dealing, and benefit to the corporation of which he is a director.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “concluded that the failure to make (a) disclosure did not clothe ... (the) otherwise fair course of dealing with intentional fraud, dishonest in purpose, and inconsistent with moral uprightness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.