Cline v. Hiatt

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1949.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-05-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1951

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-05-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Chester Loyd Cline, Atlanta, Ga., in ropria persona, for appellant.

¶2J. Ellis Mundy, U. S. Attorney, and Harvey H. Tisinger and F. Douglas King, Asst. U. S. Attorneys., Atlanta Ga., for appellee.

¶3Before SIBLEY, HOLMES, and Mc-CORD, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5On an order to show cause why the writ of habeas corpus should not issue it appeared that applicant was imprisoned under a sentence imposed by the District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. The. complaint is that no proof was submitted to show the automobile involved had been stolen, and that accused was not confronted with the witnesses against him. No application for relief has been made to the Kentucky court. No reason appears why it should not be there made, under the last paragraph of Section 2255 of Title 28 U.S.. C.A. The writ was properly refused.

¶6Affirmed.