Michael v. Reading Co.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 3, 1949.

Decided May 9, 1949.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-05-09

2 counsel of record

Relies on 82 F. Supp. 54 - Michael v. Reading Co.

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-05-09

¶1Henry R. Heebner, Philadelphia, Pa. (Wm. Clarke Mason, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

¶2Gordon H. Mahley, Syracuse, N. Y. (Harry A. Demar, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before MARIS, GOODRICH, and MCLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The sole question raised by the appellant in this case is whether there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s negligence to support the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff. We agree with the district court, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge McGranery denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, 82 F.Supp. 54, that the evidence was sufficient.

¶6The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.