Blair v. Finan’s Empirical Analysis
174 F.2d 925 · 1949
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2013
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 501
Relies on North American Car Corp. v. Peerless Weighing & Vending Machine Corp. · 16 Del. Ch. 289 - Gaskill v. Gladys Belle Oil Co. · In re Flatbush Ave.-Nevins St. Corp. · Olson v. Rossetter · Towers Hotel Corp. v. Lafayette Nat. Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In confirming a plan of reorganization, the court may only retain jurisdiction in order to protect its decree, to prevent interference with the execution of the plan, and to aid otherwise in its operation, and may not, through the device of retaining jurisdiction, keep a debtor in tutelage.... any reservation of jurisdiction beyond what is requisite to effectuate a plan of reorganization is beyond the power of the organization court.” (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.