Harrison v. Rubin’s Empirical Analysis

174 F.3d 249 · 1999

Citation profile

cited by 39 later decisions

November 2020

most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 29 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Bowden v. United States (1999), 283 F. Supp. 2d 25 - Bowie v. Ashcroft (2003)

4 federal appellate · 29 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Calhoun v. Massie · Williamsburg Wax Museum, Inc. v. Historic Figures, Inc. · Zukle v. Regents of the University of California · Loe v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Although this Circuit has recognized undue delay as a basis for denying a motion to amend, we have done so only where plaintiffs sought to add new factual allegations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Borda v. U.S. Dep't of Justice
“[u]nless a defendant is prejudiced on the merits by a change in legal theory ... a plaintiff is not bound by the legal theory on which he or she originally relied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 302 F. Supp. 3d 257 - Gilliard v. Martin Gruenberg, Chairman, Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.
“[c]laims and defenses under the two statutes are virtually identical,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 570 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Di Lella v. UNIVERSITY OF DIST. OF COLUMBIA

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.