Houston v. Greiner’s Empirical Analysis
174 F.3d 287 · 1999
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2107 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Houston v. Lack · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Ellender v. Schweiker · Weedon v. Gaden · Yaretsky v. Blum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Entry of judgment,' which is required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 58, is the act of recording in a docket maintained by the clerk of a court the fact that a judgment has been rendered. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 79(a). The `entry' date is not necessarily the same date that the judgment is dated, i.e., signed by the judge or court clerk, nor the same date that it is filed, i.e., date and time-stamped as officially received by the clerk's office....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.