Pickle v. Char Lee Seafood, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
174 F.3d 444 · 1999
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2016
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co. · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Cushing · Norwich Company v. Wright · Moore-M v. Richardson · Vodusek v. Bayliner Marine Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determining the rights and liabilities of the parties to admiralty cases”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Thus if the ship is lost, the value is zero; if a few strippings from the wreck and a life boat or two are saved, those may be solemnly handed over to a trustee or their value ascertained and a bond posted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to induce the heavy financial commitments the shipping industry requires by mitigating the threat of a multitude of suits and the hazards of vast, unlimited liability as a result of a maritime disaster.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.