Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 F.3d 498 - Colson v. Grohman

Colson v. Grohman’s Empirical Analysis

174 F.3d 498 · 1999

Citation profile

137
cited by 137 later decisions
3
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 137 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Kinney v. Weaver (2004), Suarez Corporation Industries v. Darrell V. Mcgraw, Jr. (2000)

24 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

9001999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Perry v. Sindermann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 137 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “alleged only that she was the victim of criticism, an investigation (or an attempt to start one), and false accusations: all harms that, while they may chill speech, are not actionable under our First Amendment retaliation jurisprudence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[T]he First Amendment prohibits not only direct limitations on speech but also adverse government action against an individual because of her exercise of First Amendment freedoms.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[C]riticism of public officials lies at the very core of speech protected by the First Amendment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.