Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 F.3d 79 - Stevelman v. Alias Research Inc.

Stevelman v. Alias Research Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

174 F.3d 79 · 1999

Citation profile

267
cited by 267 later decisions
December 2023
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 25 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 267 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Carol Novak v. Sally Frame, Janas v. McCracken (1999)

28 federal appellate · 25 district ·

17101999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green · Goldman v. Belden · Shields v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc. · Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp. · Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 267 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “central inquiry is whether adequate notice of the matters raised in the amended pleading has been given to the opposing party within the statute of limitations by the general fact situation alleged in the original pleading.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An amendment of a pleading relates back to the date of the original pleading when ... (2) the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) specify the statements that the plaintiff contends were fraudulent, (2) identify the speaker, (3) state where and when the statements were made, and (4) explain why the statements were fraudulent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.