Fenton v. Inc’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) [the plaintiff] was a member of a protected class; (2) [the plaintiff] was subjected to unwelcome harassment; (3) the harassment complained of was based upon sex; (4) the harassment unreasonably interfered with the plaintiff’s work performance or created a hostile or offensive work environment that was severe and pervasive; and (5) the employer knew or should have known of the charged sexual harassment and failed unreasonably to take prompt and appropriate corrective action.”

   7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Larocque v. City of Eastpointe · Ojemudia v. Rite Aid Services, L.L.C.

2. “manifests indifference or unreasonableness in light of the facts”). . In response, defendant asserts that plaintiff's claim that she is entitled to adverse inference is”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Crawford v. Aerotek, Inc. · 163 F. Supp. 2d 894 - Farra v. General Motors Corp.

3. “1. That she engaged in a protected activity; 2. That the defendant knew of this exercise of her protected rights; 3. That the defendant consequently took an employment action adverse to plaintiff; and 4. That there was a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 108 F. Supp. 2d 757 - Hoffman v. Sebro Plastics, Inc. · 75 F. Supp. 2d 711 - Strouss v. Michigan Department of Corrections