Minor v. Ivy Tech State College’s Empirical Analysis
174 F.3d 855 · 1999
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents (2000), Mendoza v. Borden, Inc. (1999)
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Quinn v. Green Tree Credit Corp. · Baskerville v. Culligan International Co. · Galloway v. General Motors Service Parts Operations
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 856. The court described the plaintiff's perception of these daily phone calls as follows: 60 Cole talked, she thought, in a very friendly way, the way a boyfriend might talk; his voice was sexy; and though he never asked her for a date or proposed any sexual or otherwise erotic connection, she believed that his calls constituted overtures awaiting a response from her. She says that his words were at times”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t is no part of Title VII to change a 'hands on' management style (provided 'hands on' is understood metaphorically) merely because it might strike a suspicious employee as having sexual overtones.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“for an employer to be required under pain of legal sanctions to ensure that supervisors never look or stare at a subordinate whom they are supervising in such a way that she might think they were”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.