Fayemi v. Hambrecht & Quist, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2018
4 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co. · Gumbel v. Pitkin · Kirshner v. Uniden Corp. of America · International Products Corp. v. Koons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he use of information obtained by a party independent of the discovery process”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the severity of the wrongdoing and the prejudice to the adversary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“conduct was sufficiently serious to warrant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.