¶1The motion for a new trial in this ease contains only the usual general grounds; and there being sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, the court below did not err in refusing a new trial.
¶2Judgment affirmed.
174 Ga. 900
Decided June 16, 1932
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1932-06-16
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1939
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1932-06-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The motion for a new trial in this ease contains only the usual general grounds; and there being sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, the court below did not err in refusing a new trial.
¶2Judgment affirmed.