Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 Ga. App. 558 - Adams v. State

174 Ga. App. 558 - Adams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Gibbons v. State · Humphrey v. State · Lee v. State · Terry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under such circumstances it was proper to allow the State to introduce prior inconsistent statements as substantive evidence. Gibbons, supra. As stated in Gibbons, “a prior inconsistent statement of a witness who takes the stand and is subject to cross-examination is admissible as substantive evidence, and is not limited in value only to impeachment purposes.” [Id. at 862.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.