Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 Ind. App. 559 - Kizer v. Davis

174 Ind. App. 559 - Kizer v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2009 · most notably 173 W. Va. 613 - Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. Tatterson (1984), Cox v. Ubik (1981)

41 state decisions

2101977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knox County Council v. State Ex Rel. McCormick · Frith v. State · 46 Cal. App. 3d 614 - Goldstein v. Lees · 159 Ind. App. 105 - Hunter v. Milhous · 172 Ind. App. 255 - Geberin v. Geberin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Canons are statements of axiomatic norms, expressing in general terms the standards of professional conduct expected of lawyers in their relationships with the public, with the legal system, and with the legal profession. They embody the general concepts from which the Ethical Considerations and the Disciplinary Rules are derived. The Ethical Considerations are aspirational in character and represent the objectives toward which every member of the profession should strive. They constitute a body of principles upon which the lawyer can rely for guidance in many specific situations. The Disciplinary Rules, unlike the Ethical Considerations, are mandatory in character.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We therefore conclude that the Disciplinary Rules, and not the Ethical Considerations, prescribe the conduct which constitutes a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Reference to the Ethical Considerations as aspirational objectives indicates that they are not com pulsory in character. Rather they express high ideals towards which attorneys are urged to strive. But attorneys are not compelled to achieve these aspirational goals at the risk of a disciplinary sanction or civil liability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'In determining the reasonable value of the legal services rendered, the time expended by the attorney alone is not a controlling factor. Among other things, consideration may be given to the general quality of the effort expended by the attorney”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.