Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 Kan. 26 - Malir v. Maixner

Malir v. Maixner’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
May 1976
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1976

15 state decisions

70195319601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rice v. Rice · Cherry v. Joyce · Bartholomew v. Fell · Stroupe v. Hewitt · Greenleaf State Bank v. Monteith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The evidence was admissible for the purpose for which it was offered, namely, to show the circumstances of the alleged conditional delivery of the contract. In no way did it vary, alter or change the terms of the contract as written. It merely went to the point that the contract was not to be considered as a delivered present contract until the other parties in interest joined in a deed to the property. . . .” (p.28,29.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Specific performance is not a matter of right but of equity, and rests in the sound legal discretion of the court. Before the relief will be granted the contract must appear to have been entered into with fairness and without any undue advantage or imposition, and the facts and circumstances must be such as appeal to the conscience of the court and compel its discretion.” (Syl. f 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.