Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 La. 287 - State v. Curry

State v. Curry’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1957
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1957

8 state decisions

40193219401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bourgeois · State v. Plummer · State v. Bellard · State v. Patza · State v. French

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is justification for holding that the omission of the words ‘with a dangerous weapon,’ where the charge is for shooting, is not fatal, because to insert them in such an instance closely approaches tautology, but this is not so as to the remaining charges [cutting, or thrusting] that may be preferred under the statute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.