Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 La. 401 - Knispel v. Gulf States Utilities Co.

Knispel v. Gulf States Utilities Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

177
cited by 177 later decisions
2
states following
September 1985
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 161 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 177 later decisions — most recently September 1985 · most notably Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. (1953), Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1940)

4 federal appellate · 161 state decisions

420193219401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Black v. Louisiana Cent. Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 177 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The disability should, we think, be deemed total to do work of any reasonable character, within the intendment of the law, whenever it appears that the employee, due to the injury, is unable to perform work of the same or similar description that he is accustomed to perform. When he is unable to perform such character of work, his occupation, due to the injury received in his employer’s service, has been taken from him, and he is in the world without an occupation. In his position he is wholly incapacitated, and what little he may learn or be able to do thereafter will likely be done under greater difficulties, placing him at a disadvantage even in securing what work he may be able to perform.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.