Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 La. 869 - Beard v. Vincent

Beard v. Vincent’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 1963
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 1963

12 state decisions

601932194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Succession of Saloy · Succession of Flynn · McNeely v. McNeely · Dejol v. Johnson · Ezidore v. Cureau's Heirs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that judicial confession is full proof against him who made it. C.C. art. 2291. But, if he be prohibited by the highest considerations of good order and public policy from making such confession, it could not be contended seriously that it had the least effect.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.