Barnes v. Verry’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 1973
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Farnham v. Thompson · State ex rel. Lindekugel v. Probate Court of Sibley County · Shuee v. Shuee · Vail v. Anderson · Granger v. Harriman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“«* * * At the time that agreement was made all debts and expenses of administration had been paid, and the administratrix as such had no further claim or rights in the property. It was the property of the heirs and subject to disposition by them as they saw fit. Even without administration, personal property vests in the heirs where there are no debts. Granger v. Harriman, 89 Minn. 303, 94 N. W. 869 . As stated in Vail v. Anderson, 61 Minn. 552, 554 , 64 N. W. 47 : “ ‘When all claims and demands were paid, including the expenses of administration, the heir at law, * * * if living, would become the sole beneficiary, and, as such, entitled to all that remained.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holtan v. Fischer“in the absence of fraud, undue influence or mistake, releases between coheirs of their rights in real or personal property, and agreements entered into between them for a division of the estate, are valid and will be enforced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“upon the devolution of property under the laws of descent and the right of inheritance thereof as of the date of the death of the prior owner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.