Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 MO 569 - State v. Spray

State v. Spray’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
4
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently December 2007 · most notably State v. Bernard (1993), State v. Sladek (1992)

64 state decisions

14019031910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Myers · State v. Burlingame · State v. Scott · State v. Daubert · State v. Greenwade

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts constituting the offense, and the very act itself, as shown by the prosecuting witness, was sufficient evidence of intent. The act of defendant, if he committed it, needed no explanation to indicate intent. The act itself carried the intent with it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.