Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 MOAPP 512 - J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Tomlin

J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Tomlin’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
September 1996
most recently cited

2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1996

2 district · 8 state decisions

40191319201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smoot v. Judd · Coleman v. Cole · White v. Anderson · Trower Bros. v. Hamilton · Davis v. Tandy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In that case the test of usury in a contract is said to be ‘whether it would, if performed, result in securing a greater rate of profit on the subject-matter than is allowed by law.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.