174 N.C. App. 278 - Boykin v. Kim’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Quick v. Quick · Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co. · Dollar v. United States · State v. Cummings · State v. Chapman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“such error was likely, in light of the entire charge, to mislead the jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Id. at 86-87, 191 S.E.2d at 440 . The party asserting error bears the burden of showing that the jury was misled or that the verdict was affected by an omitted instruction. Robinson v. Seaboard System Railroad, 87 N.C.App. 512 , 524, 361 S.E.2d 909 , 917, disc. review denied, 321 N.C. 474 , 364 S.E.2d 924 (1988).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.