174 N.C. App. 517 - In Re EC’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
70 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 169 N.C. App. 423 - In Re PM · 112 N.C. App. 747 - Matter of Safriet · 10 N.C. App. 545 - In Re Custody of Stancil · 82 N.C. App. 244 - Woncik v. Woncik · 64 N.C. App. 95 - Matter of Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny dispositional order under which a juvenile is removed from the custody of a parent, guardian, custodian, or caretaker . . . shall provide for appropriate visitation as may be in the best interests of the juvenile and consistent with the juvenile's health and safety.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage“the court should safeguard the parent's visitation rights by a provision in the order defining and establishing the time, place and conditions under which such visitation rights may be exercised.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“but the record is devoid of such a visitation schedule or any other visitation plan in effect. As this Court has explained, [a]n appropriate visitation plan must provide for a minimum outline of visitation, such as the time, place, and conditions under which visitation may be exercised. The trial court may also in its order, however, grant some”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.