174 N.C. App. 668 - State v. Artis’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · State v. Smith · Andreas v. United States · State v. Wallace · State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This evidence was sufficient to prove that defendant knowingly possessed the cocaine located in the hat. This assignment of error is overruled. III. Defendant's guilty plea Defendant argues that the trial court erred in accepting defendant's guilty plea to attaining the status of an habitual felon. Defendant contends that the State failed to provide an adequate factual basis for the guilty plea. We agree and vacate defendant's guilty plea. Defendant did not object to the trial court accepting his guilty plea at trial. However,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The judge may not accept a plea of guilty or no contest without first determining that there is a factual basis for the plea. This determination may be based upon information including but not limited to: (1) A statement of the facts by the prosecutor. (2) A written statement of the defendant. (3) An examination of the presentence report. (4) Sworn testimony, which may include reliable hearsay. (5) A statement of facts by the defense counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not. A single act may be an offense against two statutes; and if each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not, an acquittal or conviction under either statute does not exempt the defendant from prosecution and punishment under the other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.