Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 N.J. 509 - State v. Darby

State v. Darby’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

51 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Cofield · State v. Stevens · State v. Bankston · State v. Marrero · State v. Koskovich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Relevant evidence' means evidence having a tendency in reason to prove or disprove any fact of consequence to the determination of the action.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In determining relevance, the trial court should focus on the logical connection between the proffered evidence and a fact in issue ... or the tendency of evidence to establish the proposition that it is offered to prove.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “1. The evidence of the other crime must be admissible as relevant to a material issue; 2. It must be similar in kind and reasonably close in time to the offense charged; 3. The evidence of the other crime must be clear and convincing; and 4. The probative value of the evidence must not be outweighed by its apparent prejudice. [ Cofield, supra, 127 N.J. at 338, 605 A. 2d 230 .]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.