Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 Okla. 4 - Carter v. Collins

Carter v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1997

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

501935194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carpenter v. Shaw · Ward v. Board of County Com'rs of Love County Okl · Stanley v. Schwalby · Stanley v. Schwalby · Neff v. Willmott, Roberts Looney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As we construe it, we are dealing here with a civil action for the recovery of money as a refund thereof, or to enforce payment of a claim for money, and regardless of its form, we hold it to be such a civil action as was intended to be barred by the provisions of section 101, O.S.1931 [12 O.S. § 95].” Id. 50 P.2d at 210 , explanatory cite added. See also the discussion in Carter explaining that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““An action brought by a claimant under section 3, chapter 20, S. L. 1925 (section 12442, O. S. 1931), to enforce payment of claim for refund of taxes paid prior to the passage of the act, is, regardless of the stated form of the action, an action for the recovery of money, and is a civil action within the meaning of sections 4, 11, 13, 98 and 101 O. S. 1931.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.