State v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · State v. Jackschitz · State v. Johnson · 107 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Hampton · 36 Wash. 2d 146 - State v. O'DAY
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ail is not taken on forfeiture as money is taken for a debt.... There should be no suggestion of bounty or revenue to the state or of punishment to the surety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kramer“directly responsible for producing the person in court or directly responsible for apprehension of the person by law enforcement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kramer“All City lacked direct responsibility for Mr. Kramer's apprehension under RCW 10.19.140”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kramer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.