People v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2024
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Hahn · United States v. Andis · People v. Panizzon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inconsistent with the statutory scheme outlined by the legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Dunlap“the court may correct an illegal sentence at any time”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Dunlap
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.