Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

174 So. 2d 736

Grall v. Risden

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 5, 1965

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1965-05-05

Decided 1965-05-05

PER CURIAM.

¶1After careful re-examination of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court so—

¶2The petition for certiorari is denied.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.
DREW, Chief Justice

¶3(dissenting):

¶4I think we clearly have jurisdiction. It is my view that the trial court should have submitted the issues to a jury for determination. I would quash the decision of the District Court.

/174/so2d/736 · .json · Public domain