Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 SO3D 1111 - McComb v. State

McComb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 507 So. 2d 1377 - Blanco v. Wainwright · 672 So. 2d 865 - Stewart v. State · Michel v. State · 782 So. 2d 410 - Forget v. State · Caruthers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ineffectiveness is apparent on the face of the record and it would be a waste of judicial resources to require the trial court to address the issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.