Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 SW3D 124 - Pullum v. Robinette

Pullum v. Robinette’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Luce v. United States · Ohler v. United States · Staples v. CBL & Associates, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “pre-introduction rulings on evidence that are conditional or provisional in nature, and, where conditions do not occur at trial, may change an earlier ruling regarding the admissibility of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.