Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

174 S.W.3d 53

State v. Howard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2005

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2005-10-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2018

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Kevin Howard (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of first-degree assault and one count of armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of second-degree assault.

¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/174/sw3d/53 · .json · Public domain