Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 SW3D 761 - Petruccelli v. State

Petruccelli v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 82nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Montgomery v. State · King v. State · Mosley v. State · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is a portrayal of not only Carol’s physical therapy, but also of her emotional and psychological state of mind as she struggles with daily living. While we hesitate to label the videotape a "day in the life” video, sometimes found in civil cases, we note that the video does give an impression of what Carol’s day to day life must be like. The video portrays the physical and emotional effect the crime of aggravated assault had upon Carol, and therefore constitutes victim-impact evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by consideration of undue delay, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.