Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 U.S. 125 - Auten v. United States National Bank

Auten v. United States National Bank’s Empirical Analysis

174 U.S. 125 · 1899

Citation profile

186
cited by 186 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

82 federal appellate · 15 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 186 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1984 · most notably Block v. Hirsh (1921), Texas Pac Ry Co v. Pottorff (1934)

82 federal appellate · 15 district · 34 state decisions — followed in 18 states

6301899190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedPark Hotel Co. v. Fourth Nat. Bank of St. Louis (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Scott v. Armstrong · Briggs v. Spaulding · Kennedy v. Gibson · Ex Parte Chetwood · Martin v. Webb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 186 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A power so useful cannot be said to be illegitimate, and declared as a matter of law to be out of the usual course of business, and to charge. everybody connected with it with knowledge that it may be in excess of authority. It would seem, if doubtful at all, more like a question of fact, to be resolved in the particular case by the usage of the parties or the usage of communities.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.