Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 VA 472 - Mullins v. Commonwealth

Mullins v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2009

15 state decisions

5019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sims v. Commonwealth · Hale v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is patent that the instruction is a correct statement of the law and that the testimony referred to required it to be given to the jury. That it was not given is prejudicial error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.