Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 Vt. 591 - State v. Danaher

State v. Danaher’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably State v. JS (2002), State v. Billy Joe Putnam (2015)

31 state decisions

180200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Austin · State v. Gleason · State v. Moses · 765 F. Supp. 847 - MacE v. Amestoy · Benson v. Muscari

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not unreasonable ... to expect a person to understand that proximity is contained within the ordinary meaning of contact”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “presence in a car by a bus stop some unknown distance from the victim who is standing outside”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “continuous presence in the home with a child”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.