State v. Higginbotham’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Wool · John A. Russell Corp. v. Bohlig · State v. Morgan · State v. Handson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]lthough the poverty guidelines establish the threshold income for qualifying for state assistance, persons with incomes that exceed poverty guidelines may receive a state contribution toward their defense, although they must share in the cost.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that defendant could have reapplied [for the services] to the [trial] court and then filed a timely appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whose gross income is at or below poverty income guidelines for nonfarm families”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.