Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

174 Wash. 2d 1006

278 P.3d 184

174 Wn.2d 1006

Docket No. 87230-9.

State v. Barge

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. William Aaron BARGE, Petitioner.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2012.

Washington Supreme Court · decided 2012-06-06

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2013

2 state decisions

Relies on 174 Wash. 2d 239 - State v. Caton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-06-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

ORDER

¶2¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Chambers, Fairhurst, Stephens and González, considered at its June 5, 2012, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶3¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶4¶ 3 That the Petitioner's "Motion to Immediately Grant Review and Grant Requested Relief" is denied. The Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of State v. Caton, ___ Wash.2d ___, 273 P.3d 980 (2012).

¶5For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE
/174/wash2d/1006 · .json · Public domain