Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 Wash. 2d 269 - State v. Siers

174 Wash. 2d 269 - State v. Siers’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Payne v. Tennessee · Jones v. United States · Hurtado v. People of the State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury . . . , and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The right to a jury trial serves a different purpose than the “nature and cause” requirement [in the Sixth Amendment] and the due process notice requirement; the former addresses the adequacy of proof of the offense charged and of the aggravating sentencing factors, while the latter simply provides a defendant notice of the charges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.