174 Wash. 2d 741 - State v. Emery’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Sullivan v. Louisiana · 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · State v. Stenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must show that the prosecutor's misconduct resulted in prejudice that had a substantial likelihood of affecting the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scherf“'no curative instruction would have obviated any prejudicial effect on the jury'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scherf“'had a substantial likelihood of affecting the jury verdict.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scherf
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.