Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 WIS 507 - Beilfuss v. Dinnauer

Beilfuss v. Dinnauer’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1948
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dupont v. Jonet · Tobin v. Tobin · Armstrong v. Morrow · Getzlaff v. Seliger · Patulski v. Bellmont Realty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The purpose of the statute [sec. 4076] is to seal the lips of the attorney as to communications made to him in good faith when seeking his professional advice in any and all matters outside of those which are to aid in a criminal intent or to violate the law. To exclude such evidence so forbidden by the public policy of this state is a rule of judicial propriety.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.