174 W. Va. 236 - State v. Stuckey’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · 171 W. Va. 342 - State v. Richey · 159 W. Va. 482 - Louk v. Haynes · 350 So. 2d 716 - Hill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) written notice of the claimed violations ...; (b) disclosure ... of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a “neutral and detached” hearing body ...; and (f) a written statement by the fact finders as to the evidence called on and reasons for ... [the transfer].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““A youthful male offender, sentenced to confinement in a special center pursuant to W.Va.Code, 25-4-6, is entitled to an evidentiary hearing when he is returned, as unfit, to the sentencing court and faces resentencing to the penitentiary; and he is entitled to counsel to assist him in the hearing before the sentencing court.” Syllabus Point 2, Watson v. Whyte, 162 W.Va. 26 , 245 S.E.2d 916 (1978).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.