Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 174 W. Va. 573 - State v. Nicholson

174 W. Va. 573 - State v. Nicholson’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2010

16 state decisions

1001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Butz v. Hein · 162 W. Va. 467 - State v. Vance · 167 W. Va. 411 - State v. Daggett · 167 W. Va. 385 - State v. Boyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n a roundabout way, the appellant asks this Court to fashion a rule that would require an interrogating official to record a suspect’s interrogation. While this Court recognizes that there are certain merits to this suggestion, we believe that, on balance, such a requirement is impractical logistieally, unnecessary given other protections that our system of interviewing suspects already provides, and, finally, in conflict with established precedent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] confession or statement made by a suspect is admissible if it is freely and voluntarily made despite the fact that it is written by an arresting officer if the confession or statement is read, translated (if necessary), signed by the accused and admitted by him to be correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.