Propp v. Sadacca’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2010
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 31 Del. Ch. 241 - Brophy v. Cities Service Co. · Kors v. Carey · Yasik v. Harry Wachtel & Diamond State Brewery, Inc. · Kaufman v. Shoenberg · In re the Receivership of International Radiator Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a method of secret distribution, against the deceit of which its creditors have absolutely no means of protection [because] [t]he fund which they have the right to rely upon has been surreptitiously taken from them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Libco Corp. v. Leigh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.