Commonwealth v. Holt’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2004 Pa. Super. 358 - Commonwealth v. Hunt · Commonwealth v. Garcia · 2012 Pa. Super. 147 - Commonwealth v. Knox · Commonwealth v. Garcia · Commonwealth v. Fulton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to differentiate between time necessary to ordinary trial preparation and judicial delay arising out of the court's own scheduling concerns. Accordingly, where a trial-ready prosecutor must wait several months due to a court calendar, the time should be treated as 'delay' for which the Commonwealth is not accountable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether the PCRA court's determination is supported by the evidence of record and free of legal error. We grant great deference to the PCRA court's findings, and we will not disturb those findings unless they are unsupported by the certified record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.