In re Tidd’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. · Henry Rauser v. Martin Horn in His Official Capacity As Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections · Matter of Sylvester · In re Bruno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was inappropriate conduct for any judge in Pennsylvania, and would deter a reasonable employee from cooperating with the Board.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Tidd“shall be governed by rules or canons which shall be prescribed by the Supreme Court”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Tidd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.