Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 Ala. 194 - Robinson v. Crotwell

Robinson v. Crotwell’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
7
states following
April 2000
most recently cited

100 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently April 2000 · most notably Knowles v. Blue (1923), Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co. (1920)

100 state decisions

3301911192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mohr v. Williams · Andrews v. Frierson · McAllister v. State · Carpenter v. Walker · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sullivan Timber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A number of the questions which arose during the progress of the trial were of such character, were so far apart from the field of general knowledge, and so peculiarly within • the scope of professional learning and experience, that the testimony of the expert witnesses was entitled to great consideration by the jury. Still the jury could not be required, as matter of law, to accept the conclusions of such witnesses. They were to determine for themselves, theoretically at least, the weight to be accorded to the expert testimony, and to base their verdict upon their own judgment of the facts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an inadequately equipped place in which to perform the operation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.