Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 175 ALA 309 - Richardson v. Mertins

Richardson v. Mertins’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 1967
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1967

12 state decisions

60191219201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Black v. Pratt Coal & Coke Co. · Underhill v. Mobile Fire Department Insurance · Caldwell ex dem. Caldwell v. Thorp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A plaintiff claiming the benefit of this exception in favor of infants must bring himself not only within the terms of the saving statute, but must also exclude the qualifying influence of section 4860 (now § 46). It is not enough that he ; is an infant when he sues, and must, therefore, have been an infant when the ' right of action accrued to him. He must also show either that the cause of action accrued to him originally, or else that he has succeeded to the rights of one against whom the limitation had never begun to run. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.